高压电力线路“感应电”人身危害的评判依据分析

摘要：

【目的】近年来，高压电力线路所产生的“感应电”是否具有人身危害性或危险性正成为一类新型诉讼纠纷，采用何种技术标准来判断“感应电”的人身危险或危害性，在诉讼纠纷的处理中存在明显分歧。【方法】通过对黔湘两地多起诉讼纠纷的实证分析，并结合数个标准的文本分析，可以明晰有关国家标准适用范围、原理和内在关系。【结果】分析表明，《特低电压（ELV）限值》不适用、《电流对人和家畜的效应 第1部分：通用部分》《电磁环境控制限值》适用于此类“感应电”诉讼纠纷的处理。【结论】依据《电流对人和家畜的效应 第1部分：通用部分》《电磁环境控制限值》，并借鉴有关国际机构的技术导则和技术标准，结合现场检测情况，从而评判高电压“感应电”的人身危险或危害性。

Abstract:

[Objective] In recent years, whether the “induced electricity” generated by high-voltage power lines is harmful or dangerous to human life has become a new type of litigation dispute. There are obvious differences in the application of technical standards to judge the personal danger or harm of “induced electricity” in the settlement of litigation disputes. [Methods] Through the empirical analysis of several litigation disputes in Guizhou Province and Hunan Province, and combined with the text analysis of several standards, the scope, principle and internal relationship of the application of national standards can be clarified. [Results] The analysis shows that the national standard GB/T 3805-2008, ExtraLow Voltage (ELV) - Limit values is not applicable, but the national standards GB/T 13870.1, Effects of current on human beings and livestock - Part 1: General aspects and GB 8702-2014, Controlling limits for electromagnetic environmentare applicable to the settlement of such “induced electricity” litigation disputes. [Conclusion] Based on the GB 13870.1-2022 and GB 8702-2014, with reference to technical guidelines and standards from relevant international organizations, combined with on-site detection data, we can assess the personal risks or hazards posed by high-voltage “induced electrictricity”.

引用格式：吴德松，蓝国青，王虎松，等.高压电力线路“感应电”人身危害的评判依据分析 [J]. 标准科学，2026 (2):118-127.

作者简介：吴德松，本科，公司律师，正高级经济师，研究方向为电力法。蓝国青，硕士，正高级经济师，研究方向为能源法、电力法。王虎松，硕士，公司律师，高级政工师，研究方向为电力法。吴立环，本科，公司律师，高级政工师，研究方向为电力法。王器，通信作者，硕士，公司律师，高级政工师，研究方向为电力法。